Tahoe conservationists challenge Martis Valley West project in court
Submitted by paula on Thu, 11/10/2016 - 8:41pm
Legal action against the approved Martis Valley West project was taken in court Thursday as three groups, Sierra Watch, Mountain Area Preservation and the League to Save Lake Tahoe, joined forces to stop the controversial development proposal they feel threatens Lake Tahoe's clarity.
“The Martis Valley West proposal poses a direct threat to Lake Tahoe and its famous clarity," aid Darcie Goodman Collins, PhD, executive director of the League to Save Lake Tahoe. "For years, our groups have attempted to collaborate with the developers and Placer County to find a solution that protects the Lake. Asking the courts to enforce the law is a last resort, but the developers have done nothing to address their project’s threats to Tahoe.”
In September, the Placer County Board of Supervisors approved the Martis Valley West proposal, a 760-unit residential and 6.6-acre commercial project to be located on a ridge overlooking Lake Tahoe and Martis Valley on Highway 267. It is just over the rim of the Lake Tahoe Basin, thus out of the direct oversight of the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA).
An impact to the area through increased traffic and extra use is expected. The environmental review of the project by Placer County states and extra 1,394 daily car trips to Lake Tahoe could result from the new development.
“So many members of the community have spoken out against this proposal,” said Alexis Ollar, executive director of Truckee-based Mountain Area Preservation. “They object to the project’s pollution from increased traffic that hurts air quality and worsens climate change, the prospect of ridgeline high-rise buildings visible from Lake Tahoe, and light pollution, washing out the stars in in our night sky.”
The Placer County supervisors’ four-to-one approval of the project — Supervisor Jennifer Montgomery, who represents the Tahoe Basin, cast the lone opposing vote — stood in contrast to the positions taken by the North Tahoe Regional Advisory Council, the California Attorney General’s office and even the county’s own Planning Commission, not to mention the hundreds of community members who have spoken out against the project.
“There’s a reason why everyone from local residents to the Attorney General opposes this project,” said Tom Mooers, executive director of Sierra Watch. “It’s a nightmare project and Tahoe deserves better.”
In 2012, TRPA enacted a Regional Plan Update designed to provide safeguards for the Lake, while ensuring that any new redevelopment is concentrated in town centers where impacts can be better managed and leads to environmental restoration of sensitive lands.
“The League decided to support TRPA’s 2012 Regional Plan Update because we saw an opportunity to ensure that development projects within the Basin contribute to efforts to protect the Lake,” said Dr. Collins with the League. “The Martis proposal goes against all of the plan’s protections. If this project was proposed within the Tahoe Basin, the developers would not only have to resolve threats to the Lake, but would have to provide associated environmental benefits for Tahoe.”
“By developing the project just outside the Tahoe Basin, the project proponents are attempting to take advantage of the beauty and attraction of Lake Tahoe without committing to any protections to ensure the Lake is preserved for future generations to enjoy,” said Ollar of Mountain Area Preservation. “Allowing this project to proceed would set a terrible precedent that a developer may simply ignore their project’s significant threats to the Lake.”
Community members have also raised objections to the project’s risks to public safety in the event of a major fire, noting the likelihood of gridlock on Highway 267 in an evacuation.
Together, the groups are seeking action by Placer County Superior Court to overturn Placer County’s approvals.
“Ultimately, our goal is not to win a lawsuit,” said Mooers of Sierra Watch. “Our goal is to get people to the table to work together on a collaborative outcome that respects the timeless values of the Tahoe Sierra.
- 1
- action
- advisory
- advisory council
- air quality
- attraction
- benefits
- board
- board of supervisors
- california
- change
- clarity
- climate
- climate change
- commercial
- commission
- community
- Community members
- council
- county
- court
- courts
- development
- environmental
- evacuation
- event
- fire
- future
- highway
- lake
- Lake Tahoe
- lake tahoe basin
- law
- lawsuit
- League to Save Lake Tahoe
- legal
- local
- martis valley
- mountain
- News
- north lake tahoe
- north tahoe
- Nothing
- outside
- placer county
- plan
- planning
- planning commission
- pollution
- preservation
- projects
- proposal
- public safety
- Quality
- redevelopment
- regional plan
- resort
- restoration
- Review
- safety
- sierra
- south lake tahoe
- superior court
- supervisor
- supervisors
- support
- Tahoe
- tahoe basin
- tahoe regional planning
- tahoe regional planning agency
- tahoe sierra
- threat
- town
- Traffic
- TRPA
- vote
- Watch
- west
- win
- work
Related Stories
- Four vying for El Dorado County Supervisor, District 5
- City Council candidates respond to 100% Renewable Energy Committee questions
- City Council candidates respond to South Lake Tahoe Chamber questions
- South Lake Tahoe City Council candidates respond to #IRunWithMaud questions
- STPUD candidates respond to questions
- SLT City Council candidates respond to 100% Renewable Committee questions
- Lake Tahoe protection groups appealing decision on Martis Valley West project
- Controversial Martis Valley West project approved by Placer County Supervisors